Simple value-risk-speed-cost scoring model
Prioritisation models are often over-engineered. Leaders end up with weighted spreadsheets that no one remembers or trusts. The simplest models are usually the strongest: clear criteria, consistent scoring, and trade-offs visible to all.
The 4-factor model
Clarity.'s OnePlan uses a four-factor scoring framework:
- Value: What measurable outcome does this deliver, and how important is it?
- Risk: What is the likelihood of success or failure, and can it be mitigated?
- Speed: How quickly will benefits be realised once work begins?
- Cost: What resources, money, or effort are required?
Each initiative is scored 1-5 on each factor. Comparing scores across initiatives makes trade-offs explicit and creates a transparent basis for prioritisation.
Why it works
- Defensible: Clear criteria anyone can follow.
- Repeatable: Works across projects, portfolios, and cycles.
- Transparent: Trade-offs are visible instead of hidden in spreadsheets.
Linking to the Value Map Framework
The Value Map Framework structures decisions into WHY, WHAT, HOW, and NOW. The 4-factor model strengthens the “HOW” by quantifying trade-offs across risk, speed, and cost — while keeping the focus on the outcome (the WHY). This ensures prioritisation is not just consistent, but also defensible and simple to explain.
Example in practice
Imagine three initiatives competing for funding. One has high potential value but will take years to deliver. Another is low cost and quick to show results but carries moderate risk. The third is safe but delivers little impact. Scoring each across value, risk, speed, and cost makes the trade-offs explicit. Leaders can defend their choice because the rationale is visible, not hidden.
Making confident choices simple
By applying the same scoring model every time, leaders build consistency, reduce debate, and make faster decisions. This is how Clarity. ensures confident choices are simple, defensible, and easy to explain across delivery, finance, and leadership.